14.6: Moments and Centers of Mass - Mathematics

14.6: Moments and Centers of Mass - Mathematics

We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

Using a single integral we were able to compute the center of mass for a one-dimensional object with variable density, and a two dimensional object with constant density. With a double integral we can handle two dimensions and variable density.

Just as before, the coordinates of the center of mass are

[ar x={M_yover M} qquad ar y={M_xover M},]

where (M) is the total mass, (M_y) is the moment around the (y)-axis, and (M_x) is the moment around the (x)-axis. (You may want to review the concepts in Section 9.6.)

The key to the computation, just as before, is the approximation of mass. In the two-dimensional case, we treat density (sigma) as mass per square area, so when density is constant, mass is ((hbox{density})(hbox{area})). If we have a two-dimensional region with varying density given by (sigma(x,y)), and we divide the region into small subregions with area (Delta A), then the mass of one subregion is approximately (sigma(x_i,y_j)Delta A), the total mass is approximately the sum of many of these, and as usual the sum turns into an integral in the limit:

[M=int_{x_0}^{x_1}int_{y_0}^{y_1} sigma(x,y),dy,dx,]

and similarly for computations in cylindrical coordinates. Then as before

M_x &= int_{x_0}^{x_1}int_{y_0}^{y_1} ysigma(x,y),dy,dxcr
M_y &= int_{x_0}^{x_1}int_{y_0}^{y_1} xsigma(x,y),dy,

Example (PageIndex{1})

Find the center of mass of a thin, uniform plate whose shape is the region between (y=cos x) and the (x)-axis between (x=-pi/2) and (x=pi/2). Since the density is constant, we may take (sigma(x,y)=1).

It is clear that (ar x=0), but for practice let's compute it anyway. First we compute the mass:

[egin{align*} M&=int_{-pi/2}^{pi/2} int_0^{cos x} 1,dy,dx [4pt]&=int_{-pi/2}^{pi/2} cos x,dx [4pt]&=left.sin x ight|_{-pi/2}^{pi/2}=2.end{align*}]


[egin{align*} M_x&=int_{-pi/2}^{pi/2} int_0^{cos x} y,dy,dx [4pt]&=int_{-pi/2}^{pi/2} {1over2}cos^2 x,dx[4pt]&={piover4}.end{align*}]


[egin{align*} M_y&=int_{-pi/2}^{pi/2} int_0^{cos x} x,dy,dx [4pt]&=int_{-pi/2}^{pi/2} xcos x,dx[4pt]&=0.end{align*}]

So (ar x=0) as expected, and (ar y=pi/4/2=pi/8). This is the same problem as in example 9.6.4; it may be helpful to compare the two solutions.

Example (PageIndex{2})

Find the center of mass of a two-dimensional plate that occupies the quarter circle (x^2+y^2le1) in the first quadrant and has density (k(x^2+y^2)). It seems clear that because of the symmetry of both the region and the density function (both are important!), (ar x=ar y). We'll do both to check our work.

Jumping right in:

[egin{align*} M&=int_0^1 int_0^{sqrt{1-x^2}} k(x^2+y^2),dy,dx [4pt]&=kint_0^1 x^2sqrt{1-x^2}+{(1-x^2)^{3/2}over3},dx. end{align*}]

This integral is something we can do, but it's a bit unpleasant. Since everything in sight is related to a circle, let's back up and try polar coordinates. Then (x^2+y^2=r^2) and

[egin{align*} M&=int_0^{pi/2} int_0^{1} k(r^2),r,dr,d heta [4pt]&=kint_0^{pi/2}left.{r^4over4} ight|_0^1,d heta [4pt]&=kint_0^{pi/2} {1over4},d heta [4pt]&=k{piover8}.end{align*}]

Much better. Next, since (y=rsin heta),

[egin{align*} M_x&=kint_0^{pi/2} int_0^{1} r^4sin heta,dr,d heta
[4pt]&=kint_0^{pi/2} {1over5}sin heta,d heta
[4pt]&=kleft.-{1over5}cos heta ight|_0^{pi/2}={kover5}.end{align*}]


[egin{align*} M_y&=kint_0^{pi/2} int_0^{1} r^4cos heta,dr,d heta
[4pt]&=kint_0^{pi/2} {1over5}cos heta,d heta
[4pt]&=kleft.{1over5}sin heta ight|_0^{pi/2}={kover5}.end{align*}]

Finally, (ar x = ar y = {8over5pi}).

Watch the video: Massenmittelpunkt 1 (June 2022).


  1. Sullimn

    This post really supported me to make a very important decision for myself. Special thanks to the author for that. I look forward to new posts from you!

  2. Ryen

    The small things!

  3. Tocho

    I'm sorry, but, in my opinion, they were wrong. Write to me in PM, discuss it.

Write a message